Retrieval over your own documents
RAG systems that put your internal documents behind the workflow, so the model works from material your team already uses.
ai@techdriven:~$ plan --scope chicago
AI infrastructure consulting · Chicago
We design and build the systems behind practical AI: retrieval over your documents, AWS Bedrock pipelines, private models, and MCP integrations that connect AI to the tools you already run. Then we document the stack so your team can operate it.
$ ai-stack plan --target production
ai@techdriven:~$ ls operating-layer/
What we build
A useful AI system has to reach the right data, connect to the right tools, and leave enough evidence for an engineer to operate it. The model is one layer. We build the operating layer around it.
RAG systems that put your internal documents behind the workflow, so the model works from material your team already uses.
Bedrock pipelines when cloud is the right boundary, connected to production infrastructure built and reviewed as code.
Ollama and self-hosted inference for environments where the data cannot leave the building.
MCP, Slack, and ticketing integrations that connect models to the systems people already use — plus AI steps inside self-hosted n8n and Activepieces automations. Not a chatbot bolted on top.
ai@techdriven:~$ resolve --data-boundary
Architecture follows the constraint
Bedrock where the cloud is fine. Local models where the answer is no. We map the data path and operating tradeoffs before choosing the runtime, so the architecture fits the environment instead of forcing the environment to fit the model.
See our full consulting practice| Layer | Runtime | Operating result |
|---|---|---|
| cloud | AWS Bedrock | production infrastructure as code |
| private | Ollama | on-prem inference for sensitive data |
| integration | MCP + APIs | Slack, ticketing, internal tools |
| automation | n8n + Activepieces | AI-assisted workflows on triggers and schedules |
| operations | Grafana + CloudWatch | monitoring, dashboards, runbooks |
ai@techdriven:~$ cat field-notes/ai-in-the-ticket-queue.md
Field-tested before client-facing
We ran AI through our own helpdesk for six months before we let it near a client queue. We kept triage, response drafting, and root-cause write-ups. We killed autonomous resolution and chatbot-as-tier-one. Humans close tickets.
Read the full field noteai@techdriven:~$ cat engagement.md
Fixed scope per phase
// stop after any phase. keep everything we produced.
Two weeks, read-only. We map the current workflow, data sources, infrastructure, cost, and risk. You keep the findings whether or not you hire us for the next phase.
The target architecture on paper before anything moves — cloud or private, retrieval and integrations, tradeoffs and rollback written down.
We build the pipelines and integrations, with infrastructure as code where it belongs. Your engineers sit in the reviews, so nothing lands as a black box.
Runbooks, dashboards, and a walkthrough with the people who will own it. If you never need to call us again, that counts as the job going well.
ai@techdriven:~$ whoami --region chicago
Local when the work needs a room
Architecture, integrations, and day-two operations can run remotely. When discovery needs the actual network, security boundary, rack, or people in the room, we work onsite across Chicagoland.
The engineer who scopes the work is the engineer who builds it. No sales-layer translation, no mystery handoff.
ai@techdriven:~$ cat faq.md
Plain answers
Start with the real constraint
An engineer will map the system behind the model — what it connects to, where it runs, how it is observed, and how your team takes it over.